What do the Zuma case and the Inge Lotz case have in common

(1) The case was driven by an unseen hand. (2) This unseen hand predetermined what the outcome of the case would be (3) The prosecution team followed instructions blindly (4) The accused was not allowed to put his side of the case (5) the might of the state was applied to ensure the intended outcome was achieved (6) the case was tried in public (7) the accused was fortunate to have large financial resources to stage a fight back (8) sufficiently motivated and financed the defense was able to use the law to defeat the action (9) the justice system worked (10) ULTIMATELY IT WASN'T THE TRUTH THAT TRIUMPHED BUT MONEY

for more see http://legal.coolforums.org